Jenaffer complains that the roofer didn't do a good job. They recommended a new roof, she refused and asked what else could be done. They offered to try to repair it. From experience I know that a roof defect which is detected, whether a crack, opening, puncture, penetration, etc., might be open and require fixing, but might not be the only thing contributing to a leak. Water flows downhill and multiple defects might all show up in the same place.
Champion came, found a defect and fixed that defect. Roofers do not "stop leaks" They repair defects in the roof. Had she followed the recommended advice to REPLACE HER ROOF she would not have had a problem. My Swiss Cheese has many holes in it. I covered over 99% of them. The one remaining one was the actual problem one. At what point do you limit what you can do?
You are being unfair to Champion, and misleading, based on your article. They made a judgement call and fixed a defect, while trying to keep within her budget. In NY State the prevailing wage for government work is $376.00 per day and with FICA (7.65%)and Workers Compensation (39%)the COST to put a man on the roof for an 8 hour day is $551.40 and the owner didn't make any overhead or profit. If he sent 2 men for 4 hours (including travel which he still has to pay for)and used some materials-HE DID THE JOB FOR FREE!!!
Jenaffer should be thanking him instead of being angry. He did his attempted repair at a loss!
Consumer Affairs is damaging the reputation of all roofers by misleading people into thinking that a single repair could stop all their problems and that an owners choice to not perform the recommended solution absolves them of any responsibility.
Tim's points are well-founded and we thank him for writing.
